What's Best Next

  • Newsletter
  • Our Mission
  • Contact
  • Resources
    • Productivity
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Web Strategy
    • Book Extras
  • Consulting & Training
  • Store
    • Online Store
    • Cart
    • My Account
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our Core Values
    • Our Approach to Productivity
    • Our Team
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Blog

Is "Follow Your Passion" Really Bad Advice?

August 11, 2013 by Matt Perman

I see that Cal Newport has a new book out where he argues that following your passion is actually bad advice.

I like Cal Newport and have been very helped by the things he has to say, such as his excellent article getting creative things done. But I think this is, unfortunately, a case of overstating a point in a way that renders it inaccurate.

For example, if “follow your passion” is bad advice, then does that mean “don’t follow your passion” is good advice? Should we do what we hate instead?

Newport argues that what we should do is cultivate skill, and we typically come to love those things we become good at. I think there’s a lot to that (though it’s not everything, and isn’t always the case).

But what I disagree with is why Newport feels like he has to “debunk” the notion that we should follow our passion. I doubt that most people who say “follow your passion” mean that in an unqualified sense. The right way to understand passion as it relates to our careers is as follows.

1. Passion truly is critical. You should follow your passion — but…

2. Passion is one of three things you need to consider. You don’t consider passion alone. Instead, you consider (1) what you are passion about, (2) what you can be excellent at and (3) what meets a real need in the world. Your greatest career effectiveness (and, likely, calling from God) is at the intersection of those three things.

3. To speak in terms of “don’t follow your passion” or “the notion that we should follow our passion is a cliche, and it’s bad advice” is to give a hugely incomplete picture of things because it can mistakenly lead people to overlook the critical place that passion does play (understood as I describe in point 2). It would be much better to say “passion is not enough,” or something like that.

4. Newport is right that passion is not always first. But sometimes it is. Let’s not discourage those people who do have a clear passion by telling them that following their passion is bad advice.

5. The best way to find your passion and gifts is to act. Years ago spiritual gifts tests were common. Rick Warren said when he took one back in the day, he only had one gift: martyrdom. Another guy who went around mooching off of others all day turned out to have the gift of “poverty” — which turned out only to reinforce him in his crazy efforts! In contrast, the way to find out what you are good at and love to do is not to take a test or just think to yourself “this is my passion,” but to do stuff. Then you find out what you love and are excellent at (and what is actually serving people), and build on that.

If that is Newport’s point, that’s great. But then his book would have been much more helpful, I think, if the big idea being used to promote it was “passion is not enough,” rather than trying to make the bold (and wrong) statement that the advice to “follow your passion” is wrong.

I’m all for bold statements, and calling attention to counterintuitive things. The trick, though, is that you have to be right in the statements you make. It’s great to say something unexpected, but that unexpected statement has to remain true once the person has understood the subject more deeply.

In this case, I think that those who have said “follow your passion” are being misrepresented.

However, with this clarified, Newport’s book is certainly worth checking out and I sure will be helpful on many, many fronts. I applaud Newport in the very helpful work that he does. I just think that this particular (very big) portion of his book and its lead marketing themes could have been recast in a much more helpful light.

Filed Under: Career Discernment

Henry Cloud: Reversing the Death Spiral of a Leader

August 9, 2013 by Matt Perman

Imparting practical and effective wisdom for improving leadership skill and workplace performance, Henry Cloud is the author of more than 20 books, including the four-million selling Boundaries series.

Here are my notes on Henry Cloud’s session, which was fantastic just like his message two years ago on three kinds of people .

As leaders, you are people who take charge and do stuff.

Leaders take the stewardship God has given them and exert their energy in that space to lead people and take ownership of that.

The hardest thing a leader has to be in charge of is himself.

Some leaders get results, and some don’t.

Some in the middle of here to there hit a block in the middle and start to stumble and fall because they can’t lead themselves.

How does a downward spiral of a leader happen?

The leaders who can stop a spiral: they think, feel, and behave differently than the ones who spiral out.

They put the smart guys who were pessimists, and the no-nothings who were optimistic, and the no-things out performed by 53%. The ones who believe they can will win every single time. The biggest factor on whether you will get from here to there is whether or not you believe it can be done. The number one factor is “do you believe that it can happen.” All leaders believe it can happen when they start, but then something happens—they get into a circumstance (and it will happen to you) where they become out of control (that is, not of their own doing—they are out of control of the circumstances behind them, and that begins to change their brain: learned helplessness).

We are designed by God to be in a cause and effect universe. But when we find ourselves in a circumstance where there are things we cannot control that are affecting us. What happens to the brain in a situation that you can’t control? It begins to change—in some predictable ways. The three Ps.

The brain begins to change in the ways it interprets everything around you.

The Spiral

1. Personal

The brain begins to interpret that in a personal way. “Why didn’t that sale happen? I’m no good.” Or a failed capital campaign. Or whatever. You interpret in a way that “I’m not good enough.” Every leader does stuff that doesn’t work. But the “dummies” don’t take it personally. They say “I guess they weren’t ready, or I need to tweak the presentation.” But they don’t conclude it’s because “I’m not good enough.” And they go on to succeed.

But for those who take it personally, the brain begins to shut down, and goes to the next P.

2. Pervasive

They then generalize from this. “My whole life sucks.” It goes to a different region of the brain and everything goes bad. Then there’s another event. You get an email that’s critical. It reinforces the first to Ps. Then to the third p:

3. Permanent

You think it’s permanent. Once the brain begins to go into this state, even the best performers can get here, but there’s a way out.

Science and the Bible always agree in a place called reality. If they’re not agreeing, you have goofy science or whacky Christians, and there’s no shortage of either.

We see David in the Bible going here. We see great leaders here.

When your brain is going negative, the things you can do to change things—you don’t do them anymore.

How do you get out of it? You have to reverse the three Ps.

Reversing the Spiral

1. Log them and dispute them

Write down the negative thoughts. 99% of will be absolutely false. Then you find the themes, and start to dispute them. You dispute it with God’s word. “What do you mean you aren’t good enough? You are my workmanship (Eph 2:10).” There is a difference between your brain and your mind. Your brain is a physiological organ that can give off false signals.

Dispute the personal stuff, dispute the pervasive stuff. One client might be mad at you, but another one loves you. It’s not pervasive. When you begin to look at the whole picture, life changes. Your life is a movie, not a scene. Every great movie has crisis scenes in it. It’s the people that see it as a scene that make it through. And it’s not permanent because there’s a hope for you.

2. Get back in control

What caused this problem? The loss of control. Write two columns. What you can control and what you can’t control. Obsessive about what you can’t control as hard as you can—for five minutes. Then take action on the stuff you can control.

Some passengers said about an airline: “It’s like they hate us. It’s like they don’t want us to be here.”

Dispute the negative noise and get back in control of what you can do.

3. Connect

Your brain turns to a cesspool of stress if it is focused on things it can’t control. The brain runs on oxygen, glucose, and relationships. So you must connect.

The opposite of bad is love. You don’t start trying to do good to feel better. You connect—relationships. Once you start to feel good in relationship, you forget about whether you are doing good or bad, and you begin to solve problems.

Study: when they connected, the brain changed.

Connect, connect, connect. When you feel the spiral starting, connect and your brain will change.

A can-do attitude is something that will give you confidence. What God wants for you is a “find-a-way” thinking.

 

Filed Under: Global Leadership Summit

Vijay Govindarajan: The Innovation Challenge

August 9, 2013 by Matt Perman

Vijay Govindarajan is a Top 50 Management Thinker and Professor, Dartmouth’s Tuck School of Business

Ongoing operations are at odds with innovation.

Strategy is not about celebrating the past but leadership in the future. And the world keeps changing in the future. So if you want to be a leader in the future, you need to adapt to change. Which is innovation. So strategy is innovation.

Manage the present, selectively abandon the past, create the future. Most organizations over focus on box 1, and think they are doing strategy.

Competition for the present is about efficiency; competition for the future is about innovation. Both are important. So how do you create the future while maintaining the present?

Innovation is more than ideas. People mistake innovation as creativity. Innovation is commercializing creativity. Creativity is the idea; innovation is commercializing the idea. Innovation takes massive work. The idea is only 1% of the process. The bulk of the challenge lays in the execution.

innovation = idea + leader + team + plan

“Effective innovative leaders are subversives fighting the system. “ “Making innovation happen is not just the job of the leader. It’s not just about breaking all the rules. You have to work with the bureaucracy. The role of the leader is not to subvert but to harness the core capabilities of the core business.”

Innovation killers: 1. Assume that innovation can happen inside the performance engine. The performance engine is built for one purpose: to promote efficiency. But innovation is the opposite of efficiency. It is about flexibility. 2. Not constitute the team and the plan correctly.

You need to separate out the team and have them devoted to innovation outside the framework of regular operations. Innovation is a non-linear shift. It’s not just an improvement on the existing model; it’s a creation of a new model altogether.

NY Times digital should not be thought of as a newspaper on a digital platform. You have to create a distinct team. This means you can have different processes, metrics, culture, people. Almost assume you are a Silicon Valley startup. But must be linked to the performance engine, because it has assets that can be leveraged (100 years of digital archives, etc.—a SV startup cannot even imagine having that). The dedicated team is the new logic; the performance engine is the dominant logic. When they interact, there is difficulty!

You have to protect the performance engine and plant seeds. If you want a tree five years from now, you have to start today—not in five years.

Conflicts are not bad in organizations. Conflicts are healthy, provided you know how to manage them.

“Innovation is unmanageable chaos.” Innovation is non-routine. Ongoing operations are predictable; innovations are unpredictable. So you have to go about planning differently.

Zero-based planning. In ongoing operations, you are responding to clear signals. In Box 3, the future (innovation), you are responding to weak signals and non-linear shifts, because box 3 is about the future, and the future is less clear. Weak signals: don’t know size of the market, what the customer wants, etc. So the job in box three is to learn to resolve unknowns. In box 1 you can plan, because you have strong signals. In box 3, it’s very hard to plan because you have weak signals. So it’s about testing assumptions. Spend a little, learn a lot. Low cost experimentation.

How do you track and judge whether an innovation is working and you should keep investing in it? A performance engine you can evaluate on the basis of present results. It’s a known system. Box 3 is an experiment. You can’t evaluate it on the basis of short-term financial results, for it’s a bet about the future. So how do you evaluate? On the basis of the ability to learn. Can you set up your hypothesis or assumptions? Can you set up low cost experiments to test those hypotheses? The way you evaluate the performance of a leader here is their ability to conduct low-cost experiments and continuously learn.

Filed Under: Global Leadership Summit

Joseph Grenny: Mastering the Skill of Influence

August 9, 2013 by Matt Perman

Joseph Grenny is Co-Founder of Vital Smarts and a best-selling author of many books.

I’ve never mentioned him on the blog for some reason, but Joseph Grenny is one of my favorite authors. His book Crucial Conversations Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High is one of the best I’ve read. Very clear, profound, and wise. And his book Influencer: The New Science of Leading Change, Second Editionshould be required reading for every Christian.

Today in his message he talked about mastering the skill of influence. Here is the chief point that stood out to me: When we want to influence people, we often focus just on motivation. Motivation is indeed a big part of change. But ability is just as crucial. In fact, most people who become effective actually start with ability and then move to motivation.

Hence, helping people develop skills is an essential part of influence.

The most effective way to develop a skill is through deliberate practice. “If you and I want more influence, we need to involve more people in deliberate practice.” In deliberate practice, the practice setting must approximate the real world; practice is done in small bites with intense focus for brief periods, and the person receives immediate feedback.

“You want to change the world? Learn how to change behavior.” And you help change behavior not simply through motivation, but through helping people develop skills.

 

Filed Under: Global Leadership Summit

Mark Burnett: Unscripted Leadership

August 9, 2013 by Matt Perman

I really enjoyed Hybels’ interview with Mark Burnett, four-time Emmy award winner and executive producer of the Apprentice, Survivor, and the recent Bible series on the History Channel.

Here’s the best quote:

“Making Christian movies or shows doesn’t give you the permission to make it crappy.”

And here’s how Hybels ended the day yesterday, which was excellent (note: this is slightly paraphrased):

Whether you are a lawyer, in advertising, in construction, in film, or whatever you do: Do it for God. Make the difference you can with the skills and talents he has given you. You only have the time now to do something beyond yourself and that will serve others.

Filed Under: Global Leadership Summit

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • …
  • 309
  • Next Page »

About

What’s Best Next exists to help you achieve greater impact with your time and energy — and in a gospel-centered way.

We help you do work that changes the world. We believe this is possible when you reflect the gospel in your work. So here you’ll find resources and training to help you lead, create, and get things done. To do work that matters, and do it better — for the glory of God and flourishing of society.

We call it gospel-driven productivity, and it’s the path to finding the deepest possible meaning in your work and the path to greatest effectiveness.

Learn More

About Matt Perman

Matt Perman started What’s Best Next in 2008 as a blog on God-centered productivity. It has now become an organization dedicated to helping you do work that matters.

Matt is the author of What’s Best Next: How the Gospel Transforms the Way You Get Things Done and a frequent speaker on leadership and productivity from a gospel-driven perspective. He has led the website teams at Desiring God and Made to Flourish, and is now director of career development at The King’s College NYC. He lives in Manhattan.

Learn more about Matt

Newsletter

Subscribe for exclusive updates, productivity tips, and free resources right in your inbox.

The Book


Get What’s Best Next
Browse the Free Toolkit
See the Reviews and Interviews

The Video Study and Online Course


Get the video study as a DVD from Amazon or take the online course through Zondervan.

The Study Guide


Get the Study Guide.

Other Books

Webinars

Follow

Follow What's Best next on Twitter or Facebook
Follow Matt on Twitter or Facebook

Foundational Posts

3 Questions on Productivity
How to Get Your Email Inbox to Zero Every Day
Productivity is Really About Good Works
Management in Light of the Supremacy of God
The Resolutions of Jonathan Edwards in Categories
Business: A Sequel to the Parable of the Good Samaritan
How Do You Love Your Neighbor at Work?

Recent Posts

  • How to Learn Anything…Fast
  • Job Searching During the Coronavirus Economy
  • Ministry Roundtable Discussion on the Pandemic with Challies, Heerema, Cosper, Thacker, and Schumacher
  • Is Calling Some Jobs Essential a Helpful Way of Speaking?
  • An Interview on Coronavirus and Productivity

Sponsors

Useful Group

Posts by Date

Posts by Topic

Search Whatsbestnext.com

Copyright © 2026 - What's Best Next. All Rights Reserved. Contact Us.