The Often Missing Reality in Most Teaching that the Final Judgment Will be According to Works
A post I wrote for the DG blog today.
No related posts.
December 22, 2010 | Filed Under Uncategorized | 3 Comments
Comments
3 Responses to “The Often Missing Reality in Most Teaching that the Final Judgment Will be According to Works”
Leave a Reply
About Matt Perman
Follower of Christ. Husband of one, father of three. Former director of strategy at Desiring God. This blog exists to help equip Christians in good works, because that's what productivity is really about.
Learn more Contact me Speaking Availability Friend me on Facebook Follow me on Twitter Like What's Best Next on Facebook
Keep Updated
Foundational Posts
Featured Series
Featured Posts
Why We Need to Give Creative and Competent Thought to Addressing Global Poverty What Does a Leader Do? Natural Planning, Unnatural Planning, and Reactive Planning How to Get the Mail Thoughts on How to Schedule Your Day How Many Times a Day Should You Check Email? It is a Good Thing for NonProfits to Raise Money Employees Are Not Overhead The Tyranny of Corporate Computer Control Bad Meetings Generate Real Human Suffering Three Questions to Ask in Any Job Interview The Great Depression as We Know it Was Avoidable How Health Savings Accounts Can Reform Health Care Better Than the Current Bill -- Without Creating Any New Laws-
Recent Posts
- How Smart Phones Will Revolutionize the Future of Medicine
- Should Christians be the Best at What They Do?
- The 5 Most Dangerous Creativity Killers
- Is There a Relationship Between Stewarding the Environment and Ending Extreme Poverty?
- Is There a Christian Way to be a Bus Driver?
- Three Rules for Making Any Company Great
- 6 Ways Leaders Can Fuel Excellence
- Top 200 Leadership Resources
- Leading in Ambiguous Situations
- Pastorum 2013
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- 0
Categories
- Book
- Business
- Career
- Christian Living
- Communication
- Culture
- Current Events
- Design
- DG Natcon 2011
- Economics
- Education
- Entrepreneurship
- Ethics
- Finance
- Global Leadership Summit
- Health Care
- History
- HR
- Innovation
- Internet
- Large Global Issues
- Leadership
- Management
- Managing Yourself
- Marketing
- Marriage
- Missions
- Non-Profit Management
- Parenting
- Philosophy
- Politics
- Productivity
- Project Management
- Publishing
- Reading
- Science
- Social Good
- Society
- Strategy
- Strengths
- Suffering
- Technology
- Theology
- Uncategorized
- Vocation
- What's Not Best
- Wisdom
- Writing
Blogs
- 22 Words
- 43 Folders
- 800ceoread
- Between Two Worlds
- Challies.com
- Copyblogger
- CultureRX
- Desiring God Blog
- His Peace Upon Us
- How to change the world
- Hugh Hewitt
- Joshua Sowin
- Life Hacker
- Made to Stick
- Malcom Gladwell
- Matt Heerema
- Mike Anderson
- Never Eat Alone
- Poverty Unlocked
- Powerline
- Problogger
- Scott Berkun
- Seth Godin
- Signal vs. Noise
- Stand to Reason
- The Laws of Simplicity
- The Resurgence
- The Scriptorium Daily
- Tim Keller
- Tim Sanders
- Tom Peters
- Vitamin Z
Websites
- Charity Navigator
- Compassion International
- Desiring God
- Fast Company
- Gallup Management Journal
- Google.org
- Harvard Business
- Innocentive
- Kiva
- Mind Tools
- Network for Good
- Redeemer City to City
- Squidoo
- Stand to Reason
- Stanford Social Innovation Review
- TakingITGlobal
- The Drucker Institute
- The Elisha Foundation
- The Gospel Coalition
- The Institute for Faith, Work & Economics
- The Personal MBA
- The Table Group
- The Wall Street Journal
- Townhall
Speaking
Map
nodirectory
Hey Matt,
Great work, as usual. One (nitpicky?) comment.
Would it be better to think of our works as being sanctified rather than justified? The first reason I thought this was because of I Pet 2.5, which you pointed out, and it has more in common with sanctification than justification (cf. Rom 15.16; both use euprosdektos). Secondly, given the background of the OT cultus in both of those texts, it is common to speak of “set apart” sacrifices, but not “justified” sacrifices, is it? Finally, I’m in awe of a God who justifies the ungodly at the Cross, but I’m not sure what justification then means if it is applied to my (evidential) good works.
What do you think? Is that straining at gnats? Have I misunderstood you?
That’s a great question to raise. I think you are right that there is indeed a sense in which we can speak of our works as “sanctified,” understood in this positional sense as “set apart” and “accepted.” So I don’t think that would be wrong at all.
I think we can also say, in addition to this, that our works are justified. Obviously there is a lot of overlap; one distinction may be that when talking of sanctification, the meaning is primarily that of holiness and being set apart.
With justification, the emphasis is on righteousness–that is, having fulfilled the requirements of God’s law.
The NT speaks of the people of God as both being sanctified (set apart, holy–I’m speaking of _positional_ sanctification here, rather than our practical growth in holiness, as most uses of “sanctified” in the NT are positional) and justified. Both are (or, in the case of sanctification, usually) positional terms, but getting at different realities. We are sanctified in the sense that we are set apart for God. We are justified in that we are forgiven and regarded as righteous, having fulfilled his law.
So also with our works: they are sanctified, but they are also justified in the sense that the sins that remain in them are forgiven and God regards them as “righteous” and “truly good” through the work of Christ, _in addition_ to regarding them as “set apart” and “sanctified.”
Does that make sense? I think the analogy of how we ourselves are both sanctified and justified gets at the difference here.
Behind all of this is a really good quote by Calvin that I might post, where he speaks of our works as being justified.
Thanks Matt, that is helpful. I think I’m aware of the Calvin quote(s) you’re referencing. Have a merry Christmas, and every blessing on your writing endeavors.