What Do You Think of This?

What do you think of this statement — do you agree or disagree?

“One should always set the objective twice as high as one hopes to accomplish because one will always fall 50 percent short.”

No related posts.

January 22, 2010 | Filed Under Uncategorized | 13 Comments 

Comments

13 Responses to “What Do You Think of This?”

  1. dcunited on January 22nd, 2010 12:09 pm

    So the idea is to set yourself up for failure to begin with, that way you can fail knowing that your target was unreachable from the start.

  2. Brian Current on January 22nd, 2010 1:09 pm

    That might go against the “SMART goals” you posted… by not being Realistic.

  3. James McConeghey on January 22nd, 2010 1:09 pm

    Strongly disagree.

  4. Joe Sweetman on January 22nd, 2010 2:53 pm

    This is like people who “trick” themselves with their clocks by setting them ahead 15 minutes. It might work in the short term, but eventually you operate knowing that the clock is ahead. The sense of urgency is lost, because you think, “ahh, I’m fine, I have an extra fifteen minutes.”

  5. Warren on January 22nd, 2010 3:57 pm

    Great trick if you always want to drive your employees with external motivators like threats and nagging, rather than taking advantage of internal motivators like personal satisfaction and accomplishment.

  6. JohnM on January 22nd, 2010 4:14 pm

    Sounds like one way to meet your objectives (i.e. what you hoped to accomplish) but I agree it is probably a bad idea. I think I would eventually (or perhaps right away) be tempted to underperform by more than 50% if I am not setting objectives with the intention of meeting them. So I say set realistic goals and objectives, but don’t be afraid to challenge yourself.

  7. BJ on January 22nd, 2010 7:19 pm

    I agree with JohnM’s last sentence.
    I disagree with the statement in question.
    That’s not a great existence–making failure part of the equation for success. I would much rather know myself and my limits and learn to wisely steward resources like time and energy.

  8. John Gallagher on January 22nd, 2010 7:47 pm

    Definitely disagree with this statement. First, it is not Realistic. Second, it is humiliating

  9. Chris on January 22nd, 2010 8:23 pm

    Disagree. We should pray for direction, research, work hard, and proceed as planned, trusting the Lord for the outcome. Sometimes it is beautifully beyond all we could have imagined. Sometimes we accomplish exactly what we set out to do. And sometimes it appears we have totally fallen short. But the Lord has a reason for whatever happens.

    “In his heart a man plans his course, but the LORD determines his steps” (Prov. 16:9)

    Also, “Commit your way to the LORD, Trust also in Him, and He will do it.”

  10. Ken Askew on January 22nd, 2010 9:06 pm

    This is perhaps the most concise formula for burnout that I’ve ever read.

  11. staffaction on January 24th, 2010 8:56 am

    Yikes! I tend to think of objective setting in terms of “achievable” but it’d be a darn good achievement if you achieve them all in the specified time table. That way they’re not impossible or a cakewalk.

  12. Buddy Williams on January 25th, 2010 5:19 pm

    Toyota said that their standards are base line. The bare minimum. They never wanted anyone to think in terms of limitation. Makes sense to me.

  13. Christopher Misiano on January 28th, 2010 4:08 pm

    This statement makes me wonder what one really “hopes” to accomplish- the realistic goal, or the 200% goal. I disagree with this statement.

Leave a Reply