<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Materialism Cannot Explain Consciousness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/11/materialism-cannot-explain-consciousness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/11/materialism-cannot-explain-consciousness/</link>
	<description>God-centered leadership (that avoids the Christian cheese-factor)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:49:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/11/materialism-cannot-explain-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-3158</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=2686#comment-3158</guid>
		<description>I agree that materialism cannot explain &quot;mind&quot;.  I have summarised the problems of materialism at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://newempiricism.blogspot.com/2009/03/materialist-should-read-this-first.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Materialists should read this first&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;The materialist concept of reality as but a single instant of time is what underlies the &quot;homunculus&quot; argument in the philosophy of mind. The homunculus argument runs as follows: photons might flow to create an image on the retina and the image on a retina can create a pattern in nerve cells in the brain but then what sees that pattern? The pattern on the nerve cells might be transferred to another set of nerve cells but then what sees that pattern? According to materialist reasoning it always seems as if another person, a little man or homunculus within us, is needed to view the content of our minds. So materialism contains a contradiction - all reality is held to be due to the flow of matter but this flow can never be our experience now, at this moment, and materialism has no other time available for experiencing anything.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that materialism cannot explain &#8220;mind&#8221;.  I have summarised the problems of materialism at: <a href="http://newempiricism.blogspot.com/2009/03/materialist-should-read-this-first.html" rel="nofollow">Materialists should read this first</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;The materialist concept of reality as but a single instant of time is what underlies the &#8220;homunculus&#8221; argument in the philosophy of mind. The homunculus argument runs as follows: photons might flow to create an image on the retina and the image on a retina can create a pattern in nerve cells in the brain but then what sees that pattern? The pattern on the nerve cells might be transferred to another set of nerve cells but then what sees that pattern? According to materialist reasoning it always seems as if another person, a little man or homunculus within us, is needed to view the content of our minds. So materialism contains a contradiction &#8211; all reality is held to be due to the flow of matter but this flow can never be our experience now, at this moment, and materialism has no other time available for experiencing anything.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

