<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spending Does Not Drive the Economy, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/04/spending-does-not-drive-the-economy-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/04/spending-does-not-drive-the-economy-part-2/</link>
	<description>Making effective decisions in life, work, business, and society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:48:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tosoni</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/04/spending-does-not-drive-the-economy-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tosoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=1437#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>Awesome, Matt. You are in for one sweet and thrilling ride. Your worldview is on the verge of radical modification. Austrianism : Economics : : Calvinism : Theology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, Matt. You are in for one sweet and thrilling ride. Your worldview is on the verge of radical modification. Austrianism : Economics : : Calvinism : Theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/04/spending-does-not-drive-the-economy-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=1437#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>Mike: It makes me more open to the free-market position on money and banking. I see the arguments, and want to think more about it. I&#039;ve purchased some more resources from the Austrian School. 

In regard to calling the other view illogical: I certainly agree that it is wrong, which does imply logical errors; my only point was regarding the tone and manner in which to disagree. Given the importance of communicating respect even in disagreeing, I think that there were some places in the book that could have done that better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: It makes me more open to the free-market position on money and banking. I see the arguments, and want to think more about it. I&#8217;ve purchased some more resources from the Austrian School. </p>
<p>In regard to calling the other view illogical: I certainly agree that it is wrong, which does imply logical errors; my only point was regarding the tone and manner in which to disagree. Given the importance of communicating respect even in disagreeing, I think that there were some places in the book that could have done that better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tosoni</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2009/04/spending-does-not-drive-the-economy-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tosoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=1437#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Matt, I&#039;m so glad you read &lt;i&gt;Meltdown&lt;/i&gt;. After reading it, especially chapters 4 and 6, do you find yourself any closer to adopting a free-market position on money and banking? The Austrians could use a guy like you.

Another thing. You made a passing point in this post that you &quot;wouldn&#039;t call the other [spending-drives-the-economy] view &#039;illogical,&#039; although [you] do believe it is wrong.&quot; I don&#039;t understand. Isn&#039;t the very point of this post to demonstrate that such a view is illogical and, therefore, wrong?

Excellent post. Keep writing about this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I&#8217;m so glad you read <i>Meltdown</i>. After reading it, especially chapters 4 and 6, do you find yourself any closer to adopting a free-market position on money and banking? The Austrians could use a guy like you.</p>
<p>Another thing. You made a passing point in this post that you &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t call the other [spending-drives-the-economy] view &#8216;illogical,&#8217; although [you] do believe it is wrong.&#8221; I don&#8217;t understand. Isn&#8217;t the very point of this post to demonstrate that such a view is illogical and, therefore, wrong?</p>
<p>Excellent post. Keep writing about this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
