<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I Learned About Productivity from Taco Bell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/</link>
	<description>Leadership, productivity, vocation, and theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:24:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More Productivity Lessons from Taco Bell : What&#8217;s Best Next</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>More Productivity Lessons from Taco Bell : What&#8217;s Best Next</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=491#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged a few weeks ago on what Taco Bell teaches us about how to define and manage your next actions. Here&#8217;s another lesson from Taco [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged a few weeks ago on what Taco Bell teaches us about how to define and manage your next actions. Here&#8217;s another lesson from Taco [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12-08-08 Productivity Power Links &#171; Geeks Guide To Productivity</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>12-08-08 Productivity Power Links &#171; Geeks Guide To Productivity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=491#comment-253</guid>
		<description>[...] Taco Bell and GTD? &#8230;the most significant solution is what I took away from the cooks at Taco Bell: I started defining my next actions not according to real specific steps (highly literal “next actions”), but according to what I can accomplish in one sitting. (via whats best next) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taco Bell and GTD? &#8230;the most significant solution is what I took away from the cooks at Taco Bell: I started defining my next actions not according to real specific steps (highly literal “next actions”), but according to what I can accomplish in one sitting. (via whats best next) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=491#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Brian: I can relate to that very much! I&#039;ve done similar things.

I&#039;d say there is actually an impulse within the GTD system itself that creates this tendency. GTD emphasizes not keeping &quot;anything in your head.&quot; So if you don&#039;t go down to the level of &quot;buy screws,&quot; it feels like you are keeping some things in your head, and if you do that you have to remember what you kept in your head and what you didn&#039;t...

But a productivity system can end up sucking a lot of time away from actually getting things done if we always go to this level of detail, just like you say. I am consciously trying to get less detailed with most of my projects -- but it can be tough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: I can relate to that very much! I&#8217;ve done similar things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say there is actually an impulse within the GTD system itself that creates this tendency. GTD emphasizes not keeping &#8220;anything in your head.&#8221; So if you don&#8217;t go down to the level of &#8220;buy screws,&#8221; it feels like you are keeping some things in your head, and if you do that you have to remember what you kept in your head and what you didn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>But a productivity system can end up sucking a lot of time away from actually getting things done if we always go to this level of detail, just like you say. I am consciously trying to get less detailed with most of my projects &#8212; but it can be tough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=491#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Confession:I have a tendency to list the sub-steps even when they aren&#039;t essential.  

This summer I decided to build a fence in my backyard and added it to my &quot;To-Do&quot; list in my iGoogle.  I listed too many sub-steps, though (buy 4x4s, buy woodscrews, borrow post-hole digger).  

Adding &quot;fence&quot; to the list would have been good enough, but I think I added everything else -subconsciously- so that I could feel like I was making progress before I even really accomplished anything significant.  Buying screws didn&#039;t get my fence build, and I sure wasn&#039;t going to forget that I needed them.

Can you relate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confession:I have a tendency to list the sub-steps even when they aren&#8217;t essential.  </p>
<p>This summer I decided to build a fence in my backyard and added it to my &#8220;To-Do&#8221; list in my iGoogle.  I listed too many sub-steps, though (buy 4&#215;4s, buy woodscrews, borrow post-hole digger).  </p>
<p>Adding &#8220;fence&#8221; to the list would have been good enough, but I think I added everything else -subconsciously- so that I could feel like I was making progress before I even really accomplished anything significant.  Buying screws didn&#8217;t get my fence build, and I sure wasn&#8217;t going to forget that I needed them.</p>
<p>Can you relate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=491#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Tim: Very well said. That is a helpful criteria: a next action is often granular enough when you *know* how to do it, even if it does literally consist of various sub-steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim: Very well said. That is a helpful criteria: a next action is often granular enough when you *know* how to do it, even if it does literally consist of various sub-steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsbestnext.com/2008/12/what-i-learned-about-productivity-from-taco-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsbestnext.com/?p=491#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Good call, Matt. For me, the &quot;very next physical action&quot; approach is most useful when I&#039;m stuck.

Allen&#039;s example of &quot;Clean the garage&quot; as being overwhelming is a good example. Instead of that, I can jot down a next action of &quot;Go through two boxes in garage,&quot; which is granular *enough* for me because -- like a Taco Bell worker making a steak taco -- I *know* how to go through a box of old stuff in the garage in a single go/sitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call, Matt. For me, the &#8220;very next physical action&#8221; approach is most useful when I&#8217;m stuck.</p>
<p>Allen&#8217;s example of &#8220;Clean the garage&#8221; as being overwhelming is a good example. Instead of that, I can jot down a next action of &#8220;Go through two boxes in garage,&#8221; which is granular *enough* for me because &#8212; like a Taco Bell worker making a steak taco &#8212; I *know* how to go through a box of old stuff in the garage in a single go/sitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
